PENERIMAAN TUBEKTOMI SEBAGAI METODE KONTRASEPSI DI KABUPATEN PANGKEP

  • Nawang Fea Aurora kesehatan
  • Muh. Andi Multazam
  • Suharni A. Fachrin
Keywords: acceptance, tubectomy, family planning

Abstract

The family planning program supports the efforts of population growth control. One of the efforts of the family planning program is to increase the use of long-term contraceptive methods such as tubectomy contraception. This research aimed to understand more deeply about tubectomy contraceptive acceptance in Pangkep Regency. The type of this research is qualitative with phenomenology approach to explore the decision of tubectomy selection by in-depth interview and observation during the research. This research is descriptive such as interview transcript, photo, sound recording and others.The result showed that the knowledge of tubectomy acceptors is low. Motivation, the support of husband and the role of health personnel is very important. The difficult factors become one of the causes and factors of the number of children influencing to the decision of tubectomy selection method in Pangkep Regency. It can be concluded that the tubectomy acceptance in Pangkep Regency is good because there is a big role of health personnel that is gynecologist and midwife always try to motivate the patients and give the information to the acceptors, and also husband support who also played a major role in tubectomy reception.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arifah, Nur, 2013. Panduan Mudah Menyusun Skripsi – Tesis – Distasi. Jakarta : Araska
Arya, Rakhi et all (2015). Profile of Post Partum Female Sterilization at Tertiary Care Government Hospital, Jaipur. International Multispecialy Journal of Health.
Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan. (2010). Riset Kesehatan Dasar (Riskesdas 2010) Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta
BKKBN, 2015. Analisis Data Kependudukan dan KB www.bkkbn.go.id diakses tanggal pada 25 Februari 2017
BKKBN, 2010. Analisis Data Kependudukan dan KB www.bkkbn.go.id diakses tanggal pada 18 Februari 2017
BPS, 2010. Hasil Sensus Penduduk Tahun 2010. Jakarta. Badan Pusat Statistik RI.
Connigham, G.G, Mac Donald PC, Gant NF, 1991. Obstetri Williams. Jakarta : EGC
Derek, Llewellyn, 2001. Dasar-dasar Obstetri dan Ginekologi Edisi 6. Jakarta : EGC
Desi, Willy (2012). Karakteristik PUS yang Menggunakan Kontrasepsi MOW di Puskesmas Pesanggrahan Kecamatan Kutorejo Kabupaten Mojokerto.
Fakultas Kedokteran UI, 2001. Kapita Selekta Kedokteran Jilid 1. Jakarta : Media Aesculapius.
Fitra, dll (2012). Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Pemilihan Metode Kontrasepsi Tubektomi pada Pasangan Usia Subur. Jurnal Mahasiswa dan Peneliti Kesehatan
Hacker, 2000. Esensial Obstetri dan Ginekologi Edisi 2. Jakarta : Hipocrates
Herlinawati, dll (2012). Faktor-FAktor yang Berhubungan Dengan Pemakaian Kontrasepsi Tubektomi Pada Wanita Pasangan Usia Subur di RSUD DR. Piringadi Medan.
KEMENKES RI, 2015. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia tahun 2015. www.depkes.go.id diakses tanggal 2 Maret 2017.
Khedkar, Devidas et al (2013). Behavioural and Fertility Factors Associated with Acceptance ot Non Acceptance of Tubectomy. National Journal of Community Medicine
Lakshmi, Getta et all (2015). A Study on Factors Influencing the choice of Permanent Method of Family Planning. Journal of Dental and Medical Science
Laras dll (2015). Analisis Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Pemilihan Metode Kontrasepsi Jangka Panjang (MKJP) pada Akseptor KB Wanita di Kecamatan Banyubiru, Kabupaten Semarang. Unnes Journal of Public Health
Manuaba, IBG, 2001. Ilmu Kebidanan, Penyakit, Kandungan dan Keluarga Berencana untuk Pendidikan Bidan. Jakarta : EGC
Manuaba, IBG, 1992. Operasi Kebidanan Kandungan dan Keluarga Berencana untuk Dokter Umum. Jakarta : EGC
Manuaba, IBG, Chandranita, I.A, 2001. Pengantar Kuliah Obstertri,.Jakarta: EGC
Published
2019-08-31
How to Cite
Nawang Fea Aurora, Muh. Andi Multazam, & Suharni A. Fachrin. (2019). PENERIMAAN TUBEKTOMI SEBAGAI METODE KONTRASEPSI DI KABUPATEN PANGKEP. Bina Generasi : Jurnal Kesehatan , 11(1), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.35907/jksbg.v11i1.129